This argument is very rare, mostly because few Christians care to realize it. The arbitrariness (inconsistency/randomness) of atheism is just absurd.

     The atheist will believe anything, as long as it doesn't have God in the equation. That's hardly scientific. That's not scientific, that's like a kid that picks and chooses.

     There's not much to say about this, but I'll give you one example: When I was doing a live debate with someone (a quantum physicist, no joke) I brought up the devastating fact of information. I asked him, "Where did information come from?" and he answered (in rather big words, I'll make it simpler), "Well, we know there is information found within the stars, that's what makes them stars. You know that the earth is a fragment of the sun, and the sun is a star with the respected name 'Sol'. Sol had Solar information which went with the earth, so when life formed, information was borrowed." This is called "Reduced to absurdity". I answered back, "Mister, that only delays the problem. Where did the information in the stars come from?" And he had this amazing answer, "I don't know yet. But someone will find out. That's the beauty of science..." So I finished with, "Well, if you base your theory on something you don't know, then how do you know what you're saying is true?"

     Notice how the atheist would believe the information to make us came from a hot blob in space? Atheism is arbitrary.