Defending the Bible
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Ultimate Proof of Creation
    • The Real Battle>
      • Rescuing Devices
      • Worldviews>
        • Creation
        • Evolution
        • Competing Worldviews
    • Resolving the Origins Debate>
      • Neutral Grounds?
      • Resolving the Debate>
        • Consistency
        • Preconditions of Intelligibility
        • Arbitrariness
    • The Ultimate Proof
  • How it all started...
    • Big Bang
    • Abiogenesis
    • Organic Evolution
  • Arguments
    • Creation>
      • Design!
      • Irreducible complexity
      • INFORMATION
    • Science>
      • Mathematics
      • Thermodynamics
      • Carbon dating
      • Probability (Chance)
    • Logic and Morality>
      • Logic
      • Morality
      • Inconsistency
      • Arbitrariness
      • Lack of Knowledge
      • Sexuality
      • Causalty
  • Informal Logical Fallacies
    • Fallacies of Ambiguity>
      • Reification
      • Equivocation
    • Fallacies of Presumption>
      • More...>
        • "No True Scotsman" Fallacy
        • Special Pleading
        • False Analogy
        • Fallacy of False Cause
        • Slippery Slope
      • Hasty Generalization
      • Sweeping Generalization
      • The Fallacy of Bifurcation
      • Begging the Question
      • Question Begging Epiphet
      • Complex Question
      • Straw Man Fallacy
    • Fallacies of Relevance>
      • More...>
        • Mob Appeal
        • Faulty Appeal to Authority
        • Faulty Appeal to the One
        • Faulty Appeal to the Majority
        • Appeal to Ignorance
        • The Fallacy of Relevant Thesis
      • Genetic Fallacy
      • Ad Hominem Fallacy
      • Fallacies of Faulty Appeal
      • Faulty Appeal to Pity
      • Faulty Appeal to Fear
  • "Missing Links"
    • Lucy
    • Heidelberg Man
    • Nebraska Man
    • Piltdown Man
    • Peking Man
    • Neanderthal Man
    • New Guinea Man
    • Cro-Magnon Man
    • Homosapiens
  • Extras
    • The Scientific Way to Shoot a Rubberband
    • Secret Deceptions>
      • The Quantum Pendant
      • "Christian Yoga"
      • Contemplative Prayer
    • Tear the Gospel
    • Free PDF Books
    • Audio Sermon
    • Webpages You Should Check Out>
      • Serving Persecuted
      • Setterfield.org
      • Save Payatas

Sexuality

No, this is not about sex. This is about the sexes.

This argument is nearly unheard of, but still legit. Basically, the evolutionists claim we came from a single cell, since that single cell had no body to marry, the cell was asexual. It can clone itself, if you'd like to put it that way.
The problem here is, if 4.6 billions years ago we were all asexual, why are there male and females? Where did we get our sexuality from?
The evolutionist will say, "Natural selection! It helps us to survive better!" On the contrary, asexuality would help us survive longer because we wouldn't need to mate, therefore endangered species could just reproduce with themselves, if they were asexual.

Well, I'll tell you where we got our sexuality from, you see, about 6,000 years ago, there was a man, the first man, his name was Adam. He was very lonely, so God gave him a woman. He gave Adam someone he could talk to and to hold on to. Woman is man's special gift, just because God didn't want us to be lonely.

Ask the atheist this: "Where did we get our sexuality from?"

*Something to ponder: Adam was told by God that eating the Forbidden Fruit was a bad thing. Eve was deceived, and Adam knew full well that if he ate it with her he would share the punishment. Perhaps Adam was so in love with Eve, and if she was going to get her punishment, she wasn't going into it alone, he would go through it with her.

    Got a question or comment?

    Please pick a topic
Submit
"...be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you..."
 -1 Peter 3:15