Defending the Bible
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Ultimate Proof of Creation
    • The Real Battle>
      • Rescuing Devices
      • Worldviews>
        • Creation
        • Evolution
        • Competing Worldviews
    • Resolving the Origins Debate>
      • Neutral Grounds?
      • Resolving the Debate>
        • Consistency
        • Preconditions of Intelligibility
        • Arbitrariness
    • The Ultimate Proof
  • How it all started...
    • Big Bang
    • Abiogenesis
    • Organic Evolution
  • Arguments
    • Creation>
      • Design!
      • Irreducible complexity
      • INFORMATION
    • Science>
      • Mathematics
      • Thermodynamics
      • Carbon dating
      • Probability (Chance)
    • Logic and Morality>
      • Logic
      • Morality
      • Inconsistency
      • Arbitrariness
      • Lack of Knowledge
      • Sexuality
      • Causalty
  • Informal Logical Fallacies
    • Fallacies of Ambiguity>
      • Reification
      • Equivocation
    • Fallacies of Presumption>
      • More...>
        • "No True Scotsman" Fallacy
        • Special Pleading
        • False Analogy
        • Fallacy of False Cause
        • Slippery Slope
      • Hasty Generalization
      • Sweeping Generalization
      • The Fallacy of Bifurcation
      • Begging the Question
      • Question Begging Epiphet
      • Complex Question
      • Straw Man Fallacy
    • Fallacies of Relevance>
      • More...>
        • Mob Appeal
        • Faulty Appeal to Authority
        • Faulty Appeal to the One
        • Faulty Appeal to the Majority
        • Appeal to Ignorance
        • The Fallacy of Relevant Thesis
      • Genetic Fallacy
      • Ad Hominem Fallacy
      • Fallacies of Faulty Appeal
      • Faulty Appeal to Pity
      • Faulty Appeal to Fear
  • "Missing Links"
    • Lucy
    • Heidelberg Man
    • Nebraska Man
    • Piltdown Man
    • Peking Man
    • Neanderthal Man
    • New Guinea Man
    • Cro-Magnon Man
    • Homosapiens
  • Extras
    • The Scientific Way to Shoot a Rubberband
    • Secret Deceptions>
      • The Quantum Pendant
      • "Christian Yoga"
      • Contemplative Prayer
    • Tear the Gospel
    • Free PDF Books
    • Audio Sermon
    • Webpages You Should Check Out>
      • Serving Persecuted
      • Setterfield.org
      • Save Payatas

Introduction to the Ultimate Proof of Biblical Creation

So here we are. Hopefully, you have a thorough understanding of the previous subjects we have discussed. If you don't, the ultimate proof will make no sense at all. If you haven't read the previous pages, I highly encourage you to start here (click here).

If it is the case that you read all of the previous pages, let's do another short recap. You know, just in case I haven't made myself clear enough:

  1. The ultimate proof of creation will not change everyone's mind, there is no such argument. But the ultimate proof is logically irrefutable. 
  2. Because we all interpret our evidence in light of our worldview, most debates over evidence will wind up becoming a frustrating quarrel where the opponents will simply "talk past each other." Therefore, the best way to debate is to debate about the opposing worldviews.
  3. Even though there is compelling evidence that is contrary to some worldviews, these contrary evidences can be explained away by using rescuing devices. But the use of the rescuing device is only logical if the rescuing device itself is logical and the worldview being defended is also logical.
  4. There are a plethora of worldviews, but the most common are theism, atheism, creation, evolution, empiricism, naturalism, uniformitarianism, and relativism. These worldviews are explained and refuted (except for biblical creation) on the previous pages.
  5. In order for evidence to be correctly interpreted, one must have a correct worldview by which they interpret the evidence. Therefore, the key to resolving the origins debate is to figure out which worldview can make sense of the preconditions of intelligibility, morality, logic, etc.
  6. There are no neutral grounds.
  7. Atheism fails to provide rational reasons behind the preconditions of intelligibility (and so do the other worldviews), which brings us to an odd conclusion: if atheism were true, we could not know anything.
  8. The Bible is the only standard that provides a reason behind the preconditions of intelligibility: God gave them to us so we can basically and reliably observe the universe around us.
  9. Since biblical creation is the only worldview that can provide a rational reason behind the preconditions of intelligibility, morality, dignity, freedom, laws of logic, etc., any other worldview would lead to the conclusion that it would be impossible to know anything since they do not provide these things.

Back to Arbitrariness
The Ultimate Proof of Biblical Creation

    Got a question or comment?

    Please pick a topic
Submit
"...be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you..."
 -1 Peter 3:15